Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-05-09 21:32:59
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1598 $1598
SAVE $click

$1397 $997
SAVE $400

$2997 $2997
SAVE $click

$230 $230
SAVE $click

$3399 $2899
SAVE $500

$3997 $3497
SAVE $500

$1797 $1397
SAVE $400

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$1999 $1449
SAVE $550

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$500 $440
SAVE $60

$2499 $2499
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

Canon EOS 5D Mark III Shadow Noise vs Nikon D800E

Real world images over the past few years have taught me since the Nikon D3/D3x that Nikon’s secret sauce in their full-frame DSLRs is eminently useful in the field for real images. And that Canon’s noise (especially pattern noise) really bugs me, and causes problems in “post”.

Accordingly my real-world comparison of noise levels between the Canon 5D Mark III and Nikon D800E should be of interest to anyone who shoots outdoors.

Especially for images similar to Tioga Lake and Mt Dana (which required an aggressive increase to shadow brightness), the issue is clear-cut for me: Nikon rules the roost, even ignoring the extra 14 megapixels the D800 offers over the 5D Mark III.

ISO 100, exact same lens on both, same RAW processing. Apples vs apples.

Canon 5D Mark III at ISO 100 + Zeiss ZF.2 28mm f/2 Distagon @ f/8

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.