Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-05-09 19:14:14
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1598 $1598
SAVE $click

$1397 $997
SAVE $400

$2997 $2997
SAVE $click

$230 $230
SAVE $click

$3399 $2899
SAVE $500

$3997 $3497
SAVE $500

$1797 $1397
SAVE $400

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$1999 $1449
SAVE $550

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$500 $440
SAVE $60

$2499 $2499
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

Format Shootout: Fujifilm GFX-50S + Fujifilm GF 23mm f/4 vs Sony A7R II + Sony FE 12-24mm f/4

See my Fujifilm GFX wish list.

In Medium Format, I take a 2nd look at assessing the image quality of the Fujifilm GFX against the Sony A7R II, following the Pescadero Creek, Downstream comparison:

Shootout: Fujifilm GFX vs Sony A7R II: Blue Water Flows Over Dark Rocks

The comparison is imperfect—it cannot be perfect given different aspect ratios, lenses and their distortion, etc, but the tripod position was fixed and it is remarkably interesting to compare the two—42 megapixels versus 50 on different sensor sizes.

What happens if Sony delivers an improved sensor and improved (less 'cooked') image file quality at, say, 72 megapixels? That would be interesting at full resolution, let alone the implications of oversampling at 72MP and then downsampling to 50. For now, the GFX looks highly satisfying.

f16 @ 7.5 sec, ISO 100; 2017-07-22 19:51:43
GFX 50S + Fujifilm GF 23mm f/4 R LM WR @ 19mm equiv (23mm)

[low-res image for bot]

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.